Choose Hyperproof if you're a 200+ employee organization running 10+ concurrent frameworks (e.g., SOC 2 + ISO 27001 + HITRUST + PCI + NIST 800-53 + FedRAMP), need granular workflow customization, and have a dedicated GRC team that wants deep tooling.
Choose LukaGRC if you want transparent per-user pricing, AI questionnaire answering with source citations, cryptographic evidence integrity, and a platform sized for 10–500 person teams pursuing 1–6 frameworks.
Pricing: what you'll actually pay
LukaGRC publishes pricing: $49/user/month on Starter, $99/user/month on Professional, custom on Enterprise. All frameworks, all modules, included. Full pricing.
Hyperproof does not publish list pricing publicly. Reported figures from buyers on G2 and public RFPs cluster around $30,000–$80,000/year for multi-framework deployments at 50–200 employees. Enterprise contracts at 500+ employees typically exceed $100,000/year.
Framework coverage
Both platforms cover the standard set plus regulated-industry frameworks. The differences come down to how coverage is delivered and what gets paywalled.
| Capability | LukaGRC | Hyperproof |
|---|---|---|
| SOC 2 Type I + II | Yes | Yes |
| ISO 27001:2022 + Annex A (93 controls) | Yes | Yes |
| HIPAA Security Rule + BAA tracking | Yes | Yes |
| PCI DSS 4.0 | Yes | Yes |
| NIST CSF 2.0 (all 6 functions) | Yes | Yes |
| NIST 800-53 Rev 5 | Yes | Yes |
| FedRAMP / CMMC 2.0 | Yes (all plans) | Enterprise |
| HITRUST CSF | Custom mapping | Native |
| Custom frameworks | Yes | Yes |
| Frameworks gated behind plan tier | No — all 40+ included | Some — varies by tier |
Where each platform wins
Hyperproof is stronger at
- Multi-program orchestration. Hyperproof was built around the concept of running many compliance programs in parallel with shared controls. If you're a Fortune 1000 with concurrent SOC 2, ISO 27001, HITRUST, PCI, NIST 800-53, and FedRAMP programs, Hyperproof's "control of controls" model maps to that reality.
- Enterprise workflow customization. Custom workflows, approval chains, role-based dashboards, and Jira/ServiceNow integration depth. Built for dedicated GRC teams that want to model their existing process.
- HITRUST and regulated-industry depth. Hyperproof has stronger native HITRUST support and a longer track record in healthcare and financial services.
- Long-tail framework coverage. If you need niche industry frameworks (NERC CIP, NYDFS Part 500, TX-RAMP, StateRAMP), Hyperproof has more out of the box.
LukaGRC is stronger at
- Transparent per-user pricing. $49 or $99 per seat per month. No sales calls, no scope-based uplift, no framework upcharges. See the plans.
- AI questionnaire answering with citations. Drafts SIG, CAIQ, VSA, and DDQ responses from your KB + policies + evidence with line-level citations so reviewers can verify before sending. How it works.
- Cryptographic evidence integrity. Every evidence file gets a SHA-256 hash chained to the previous entry, so the chain is tamper-evident for auditors. No competitor has this by default.
- Time to first value. Most LukaGRC customers are running their first scope assessment within an hour of signup. Hyperproof typically involves a multi-week implementation engagement before the system is operational.
- BC/DR module included. Business Impact Analysis, Recovery Plans, Tabletop Exercises — built in, not a separate purchase.
Feature-by-feature
| Feature | LukaGRC | Hyperproof |
|---|---|---|
| Per-user transparent pricing | Published | Quote-based |
| AI questionnaire drafting with citations | Yes | Limited |
| Evidence collection + cryptographic chain | SHA-256 chained | Collection only |
| Vendor risk management (TPRM) | Included | Available |
| Business continuity / DR module | Included | Not native |
| Tabletop exercise tracking | Built in | Manual |
| Risk register with quantitative scoring | Yes | Yes |
| Policy generation with framework mapping | AI-assisted | Templates |
| Trust Center (public posture page) | Built in | Available |
| Multi-program orchestration | Yes, simple model | Deep workflow |
| Time to first value | Under 1 hour | 2–6 week implementation |
| Free trial (no card) | 7 days | Demo-led |
When LukaGRC is the better fit
Hyperproof was designed for large GRC teams that want deep workflow tooling. That depth becomes overhead if you're a 30-person SaaS pursuing your first SOC 2. The most common pattern we see:
- You're a 10–200 person company on your first 1–3 frameworks
- You don't have a dedicated full-time GRC manager — engineering and security do compliance part-time
- You need to answer security questionnaires faster than you can hire
- You want to know exactly what compliance will cost without a 6-week procurement cycle
In those cases, the speed-to-value gap is large. LukaGRC gets you to your first useful artifact (a populated framework map, a draft policy, an answered questionnaire) within an hour. Hyperproof's strength shows up later, at scale.
Switching from Hyperproof to LukaGRC
Migration from Hyperproof is usually a one-day exercise for small to mid-market deployments:
- Export from Hyperproof: risks (CSV), controls (CSV), vendors (CSV), evidence files (bulk download), policies (Markdown or PDF).
- Import into LukaGRC: Data Import module accepts CSV for risks, vendors, controls, and evidence metadata. Policy markdown imports as draft for human review.
- Re-run integrations: reconnect cloud accounts through LukaGRC's OAuth flows. Evidence backfill begins immediately.
- Map controls: LukaGRC's framework engine re-derives most control mappings from your scope answers. Custom controls carry over via CSV.
Contact hello@lukagrc.com for a guided migration with shared screens.
Frequently asked questions
Is LukaGRC cheaper than Hyperproof?
For teams under 100 employees pursuing 1–4 frameworks, almost always — typically 30–60% less. For 500+ employee multi-framework programs with custom workflow requirements, the comparison is closer and depends on which Hyperproof tier and how many concurrent programs are in scope.
Does my auditor accept evidence from LukaGRC?
Yes. LukaGRC exports evidence in the formats auditors expect (PDF, CSV, ZIP), with cryptographic hashes and full audit trail. The CPA firms we work with — Schellman, Prescient, A-LIGN, Insight Assurance — accept LukaGRC evidence directly.
Does LukaGRC support running 10+ frameworks at once like Hyperproof?
Yes, with a simpler model. LukaGRC's framework engine handles control-sharing automatically across all active frameworks — answer a scope question once, and the answer flows to every framework it applies to. If you need bespoke per-framework workflows with custom approval chains, Hyperproof has deeper tooling. If you want the work just to flow through automatically, LukaGRC is the better default.
Is LukaGRC enterprise-ready?
Yes for mid-market enterprises. SAML/OIDC SSO, SCIM provisioning, dedicated AI endpoints, US-domiciled AWS infrastructure, PostgreSQL row-level security, and a multi-tenant architecture validated under SOC 2 controls. For organizations with 1,000+ headcount and complex GRC org structures (federated programs, internal audit separation, regulatory reporting), Hyperproof's workflow tooling may still be the better fit.